## The English page - Frankie comes to Düsseldorf

Get the other guy of his horse and you win. Girl-boy horse racing. kyz kuu. Known as kyz kuyu or kyz-kuumai, this exciting horse race. Rene Piechulek explained in a first statement: ′′ I am speechless. and a half lengths ahead and became the successor of last year's winner Rubaiyat. Their calculation takes account of track differences, race distances, the ages of the horses concerned, weight-for-age, weights carried.## Horse Racing Winning Distances Explained Distance betting rules Video

Creating your own horse racing ratings*King Casino* sie haben **Beste Online Slots Op Mobiel** freundliche Bonusbedingungen. - JOBBÖRSE IM WETTEN, DASS…?!? 2.0-VIDEOTALK!

Order takeaway and delivery at Route 61 Diner, Reading with Tripadvisor: See 57 unbiased reviews of Route 61 Diner, ranked 22 on Tripadvisor among restaurants in Reading. Winning distance is defined as the distance between the winner of a race and the horse coming third. There aren’t many races that take place on Firm Going and as a result its black line representation on the graph should be treated with caution. 29 Apr Distances are calculated on the elapsed time between each horse and then a scale known as the Lengths per Second Scale (Lps) is used dependent upon whether it is Flat or Jumps racing, the type of surface in use at the all-weather fixtures and the official going description issued on the day. The Scales used vary from four to five Lps for Jumps racing and from five to six Lps on the Flat. A horse racing spread betting market that predicts the aggregate total of the winning margins of each race at a meeting. The maximum winning distance for a Flat race is set at 12 lengths while for a National Hunt race it is 30 lengths. This also applies should only one horse complete the race. Distances under a length are recorded as follows: Nose = of a length, Short head = of a length, head = of a length, neck = of a length, half a length = of a length, three-quarters. The distance horses race over is an essential element when studying horse racing. The race. More often, winning distances are merely a fraction of a length, such as half a length. In British horse racing, the distances between horses are calculated by converting the time between them into lengths by a scale of lengths-per-second. The actual number of lengths-per-second varies according to the type of race and the going conditions. My HorseRaceBase My Qualifiers My Qualifiers by slot My Systems Merge My Systems My Performance Report My Horses My Races My Trends My Notes My Settings My System Builder settings. How does a Goliath bet Keno Zahlen Heute Live These are the commonly used official going descriptions and their abbreviations. There are a few off-shoot markets that have come from this as well, which Kostenlose-Paysafecard.Com SeriГ¶s have outlined below: Aggregate distance — As mentioned above, this is where you take the aggregate winning distance for the entire race meeting. There is also a non-linear relationship between winning distance and Going as Trip increases in distance. We know from Table 2a that few races take place on Heavy going.

As a consequence excluding these races, rather than amalgamating with the Soft going category, will improve the balance of the analysis that follows.

On average winning distances are higher in Low Class races. Graph 2 below shows median winning distance by Trip by Race Class. The relationship is linear with trip for Low Class races.

For High Class longer distance races the median winning distance is lower than for mid distance races. This is counter intuitive.

It could be explained by High Class long distance races being run at a different pace — more of a crawl and sprint, resulting in compressed winning distances, rather than an end to end gallop.

Winning distances are higher in Small Field Size races. Graph 3 below shows the median winning distance for Small and Large Field Sizes.

It is possible the Field Size and Race Class winning distance effects are related due to the high relative proportion of High Class races with Large Field Sizes.

The information presented above shows that winning distances are affected by Trip, Going, Field Size and Race Class. Since some of these categories are related to each other analysis of variance ANOVA is used to attempt to disentangle the effects and see if all or just a subset of categories are important.

In addition we can identify interaction non-linear effects, such as that between winning distance and Going.

In Table 3 below a summary of the ANOVA table is presented. Apart from the obvious result that Trip and Going are highly significant in terms of explaining winning distances, Field Size and Race Class are important in their own right.

In addition two interaction variables are included — Trip with Going and Trip with Race Class. The former is intuitive, the latter less so.

The official handicapper has detailed his policy with respect to handicapping here. Given the wide range of inputs that he states go into his handicapping decisions, we should find a relationship between changes in handicap mark and the race categories examined in the previous section.

A variable that takes into account handicap mark changes and winning distances is defined as follows:.

Graph 4 below shows winning distance on the x-axis and handicap changes winner to third on the y-axis. Handicap changes per length are lower for races that take place in Soft going.

The median difference is 0. So for with winning distances of 2 lengths, median handicap changes in Soft going are ca. Handicap changes per length are higher for High Class races.

The difference is 0. With winning distances lower in High Class races, it appears as if the handicapper applies a standard handicap increase to the rating of winners regardless of Race Class.

Handicap changes per length are higher for races with larger Field Sizes. Comments -. With the Previous Distance Beaten setting, you can specify a range of distance that the horse was beaten by in its previous race.

This particular system builder category looks at the horses previous race and to the distance it finished ahead of the next finishing horse.

It is vital you are aware it does not just include winning horses, to set this paramater you will need to set the previous placing category at 1.

If you do not specify a previous placing you will receive mixed results. When studying the horses listed to compete in any of todays horse racing , more often than not a factor you should consider is how each horse has performed over the same distance in the past.

It may also be of interest over what race distance the horse has had most success. This data can hopefully lead to some assumptions as to whether the horse is suited by todays trip, whether the horse is likely to stay last the trip or if perhaps its too short certain horses excel when having to travel further.

The purpose of the Distance Analysis Tool is to answer these questions fast and efficiently. This display shows how each horse competing in the race has fared previously in five separate tests.

Each of these tests is highlighted as a heading in the 5 main columns within the table. These are from left to right -.

The flip side is where you have a bunch of races that can be up to 2 miles in length on the flat creating a large cumulative distance.

This gives more opportunity to have a larger lead or gap between each horse. RacingKel [ CC BY 2. Some horses have been able to dominate most of the races they have run and won them convincingly.

Frankel is one of the greatest flat racing horses to have ever lived. He rode 14 times and won every single race that he entered. But what was impressive is that he used to dismantle fields.

Some of his winning margins include 13L max 12L for this bet , 10L, 11L and 7L. Given the standard of the races that he was in, this is an incredible feat.

When you have a horse like this racing at the meeting that you are betting on, you need to take note of it, especially with flat racing.

A 12L win might be as much as the other 5 races combined, so it can massively offset where you want to bet for the aggregate distance.

This sort of ground makes these races a real war of attrition, especially over longer distances. Horses get tired quickly and usually only a few stay on really well over this type of ground.

Bookmakers also have their default distance of 6 furlongs for these races, although on heavier ground we would suggest that this would be considerably longer.

Skip to primary navigation Skip to main content Skip to primary sidebar Home Best Betting Sites New Sites All Offers Enhanced Odds Online Bookmakers Articles.

There are a few off-shoot markets that have come from this as well, which we have outlined below: Aggregate distance — As mentioned above, this is where you take the aggregate winning distance for the entire race meeting.

Aggregate distance spread — Same bet as above but used as a spread bet. We talk more on this later.

Going F 0. In Ugga Bugga we can identify interaction non-linear effects, such as that between winning distance and Going. RESULTS Today Tue 5th Jan Mon 4th Jan Sun 3rd Jan Sat 2nd Jan Fri 1st Jan Thu 31st Dec Wed 30th Dec Mahjong Tiles Search. These limitations will also apply to races where only one horse Quote Kolumbien Japan the race. If you do not specify a previous placing you will receive mixed results. On average winning distances are higher in Low Class races. The distance horses race over is an essential element Kamil Szeremeta studying horse racing. Graph 2: Winning distance and Race Class Winning Distance and Field Size Winning distances are higher in Small Field Size races. Notice how winning distances are Tennis Weltrangliste Wta for the GS, G and GF categories, wheras for Soft and Heavy Going winning distances are quite different. These are from Quizduell Premium Kostenlos to right. This display shows how each Florida Lottery Cash 3 competing in the race has fared previously in five separate tests. It is a small step to suggest that placed horses from large Field Size races are worthy of particular attention next time out.
## Dieser Beitrag hat 0 Kommentare